Intellectual Property Office Of Singapore
Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map


HomeAbout UsServicesProgrammesLegislationResourcesForms & FeesNews & EventsCareersUseful LinksFaqs
EmailEmail to Friend PrintPrinter-friendly  
About IP
Definition
Register IP
Patents
Trade Marks
Designs
Plant Varieties Protection
Other IP
Copyright
Trade Secrets & Confidential Information
Geographical Indications
Layout-Designs of Integrated Circuits
Home > IP Bulletin > Trade Marks > Courts Will Not Hesitate To Take Into Account Aggravating Factors in Sentencing Intellectual Property (IP) Offenders
 

Courts Will Not Hesitate To Take Into Account Aggravating Factors in Sentencing Intellectual Property (IP) Offenders

In June 2007, the District Court sentenced Koh Eng Kian to a total of 36 months' imprisonment after he pleaded guilty to 9 charges of abetment of copyright infringement and three charges of abetment of trade marks infringement.  Another 23 charges of copyright infringement were taken into consideration.

Koh had abetted with his accomplices in a conspiracy offering to sell goods which both infringed subsisting copyrights and registered trade marks.  He had set up three shops with the help of various accomplices in the sale of counterfeit products in various HDB estates.

In sentencing, the court held that the dominant consideration was deterrence.  It took into account that there was a planned operation with the accomplices manning the shops and with Koh supervising in the background.  Koh's illegal business operated on a large scale and included a wide diversity of products.  A total of 9,008 infringing articles containing computer software and other copyright works were involved, including brands such as BMG, Microsoft, Apple Computers and Warner.  The court also noted Koh's brazen disregard for the law as the shops were located in busy housing estates.  As the mastermind behind a sophisticated operation, Koh had avoided detection by using his accomplices to sign the tenancy agreements for his shops.  The court also found that Koh bore a higher level of culpability than his accomplices as he was the actual proprietor of the shops and had them under his control, employment and supervision.

This case highlights the court's stance in that it would not hesitate to take into account relevant factors in passing a harsher sentence for IP offenders.

   
   
Top Last updated on 03 Mar 2008
  The HIP (Honour IP) Alliance

The HIP (Honour IP) Alliance

Directory of IP Providers Online IP Search Online IP Search IP Management Diagnostic Tool IP Management Diagnostic Tool  
 
Privacy Statement | Terms of Use
© 2007 Government of Singapore
Best viewed using IE 6.0+